摘要:自今年8月14日凌晨王宝强发微博指责妻子马蓉与经纪人宋哲之间存在婚外不正当两性关系,并宣布决定解除与马蓉的婚姻关系以来,王宝强和妻子马蓉的离婚案就一直备受关注,昨天即10月18日,王宝强起诉马蓉的离婚案及马蓉起诉王宝强名誉侵权

自2020年8月14日零晨王宝强发布微博斥责老婆马蓉与艺人经纪人宋哲中间存有婚内出轨不正当性男女关系,并公布决策消除与马蓉的夫妻关系至今,王宝强和老婆马蓉的离婚案就一直备受关注,昨日即10月18日,王宝强提起诉讼马蓉的离婚案及马蓉提起诉讼王宝强名誉侵权案各自在下午2点和4点半举办庭前会议,两案均不开展公开审判。即使如此,前天北京朝阳区法院的门口還是集聚了大量新闻媒体新闻记者,一些新闻媒体也是搭建直播工具等在门口,在王宝强到达法院,从被告方通道根据安全检查进到法院时,当场也是一片错乱,在警员控制住动乱群体的另外,戴着太阳眼镜身穿灰黑色连帽卫衣的王宝强不张扬亮相进到法院,身影稍显削瘦。

马蓉围绕子女身份提交证据系王宝强亲生

(马蓉紧紧围绕儿女真实身份递交直接证据系王宝强亲生父母)

昨晚,朝阳区法院根据官博公布通告。从朝阳法院获知,昨天的庭前会议延迟时间逾五小时。在大会中,王宝强紧紧围绕马蓉婚后出轨、迁移夫妇夫妻共同财产及规定切分的夫妻共同财产开展了举证;马蓉方则紧紧围绕儿女真实身份状况递交了直接证据,疑是证实儿女为王宝强亲生父母。据统计,马蓉自己当日未报名参加庭前会议,但于庭前会议前出庭阐述了建议。据法律法规人员剖析,离婚诉讼务必最少有一次自己参加表述是不是愿意离异,马蓉先前这一举动很有可能向法院亲身表述愿意离异。而王宝强此次亲身参加庭前会议,也是表述了对离异的果断心态。在离婚案中,依据被告方的诉辩建议及举证状况,法院规定合并审理彼此就夫妻关系是不是裂开、如消除夫妻关系儿女的养育难题、被上诉人是不是存有过失及是不是对上诉人导致精神损失进一步举证。

而在接着的名誉侵权纠纷案件庭前会议中,马蓉方紧紧围绕王宝强公布新浪微博个人行为组成名誉侵权及给上诉人导致的声誉危害递交了有关直接证据;王宝强不认同损害了上诉人的侵犯名誉权,但未复庭递交直接证据,表明将在举证期内递交,法院给彼此要求举证限期。

除此之外,在离婚案庭前会议案件审理全过程中,依据被告方的诉辩建议及举证状况,法院规定合并审理彼此做进一步举证。马蓉一方还以此案涉及到中国公民私人信息为由,向法院明确提出不公开审理。北京朝阳区老百姓法院经核查觉得,其申请办理合乎有关法律法规,依规给予准予。而王宝强以离异和名誉侵权两案另外案件审理,很有可能造成矛盾为由向法院申请办理中止审理侵犯名誉权纠纷案件一案。该申请办理将由仲裁庭评定后决策是不是准予。那天晚上,王宝强根据新浪微博发音,表明开庭审理很成功,对新闻媒体和关注自身的盆友感谢,并表明“有大家在,我一直顽强”。

Since the morning of August 14, 2020, Wang Baoqiang posted a micro blog to reprimand his wife Ma Rong and his artist agent Song Zhe for having an illegal sexual relationship within marriage, and announced the decision to eliminate the marital relationship with Ma Rong. So far, the divorce case between Wang Baoqiang and his wife Ma Rong has attracted much attention. Yesterday, October 18, Wang Baoqiang filed a lawsuit against Ma Rong and Ma Rong filed a lawsuit against Wang Baoqiang The reputation infringement cases held pre-trial meetings at 2:00 p.m. and 4:30 p.m., and no public trial was conducted in both cases. Even so, a large number of news media reporters gathered at the gate of Beijing Chaoyang District Court the day before yesterday, and some news media also set up live broadcasting tools at the door. When Wang Baoqiang arrived at the court and entered the court from the defendant's channel according to the security inspection, it was a mess on the spot. In addition, when the police controlled the chaotic group, they wore sunglasses and gray black hooded guards The clothes of Wang Baoqiang do not make public appearance into the court, slightly emaciated figure.
A kind of
(Ma Rong submits direct evidence around the true identity of her children, who are Wang Baoqiang's biological parents)
Last night, Chaoyang District Court announced a notice according to the official blog. According to the Chaoyang Court, yesterday's pre-trial meeting was delayed for more than five hours. In the conference, Wang Baoqiang closely focused on Ma Rong's marriage, the common property of the transferred couple and the property of the husband and wife divided according to the provisions; Ma Rongfang submitted direct evidence closely around the real identity of his children, which was suspected to be the biological parents of Wang Baoqiang. According to statistics, Ma Rong did not sign up to attend the pre-trial meeting on the same day, but appeared in court before the pre-trial meeting to elaborate on the proposal. According to the analysis of legal and regulatory personnel, it is necessary to participate in the divorce proceedings at least once to express whether she is willing to divorce. Ma Rong's previous move is likely to personally express her willingness to divorce to the court. And Wang Baoqiang's personal participation in the pre court meeting also expressed his resolute attitude towards divorce. In divorce cases, according to the defendant's proposal and the status of proof, the court stipulates that the joint trial should be conducted to further prove whether the marital relationship is split, such as eliminating the parenting problems of the husband and wife relationship, whether the appellee has fault, and whether the appellant causes mental loss.
In the following pre court meeting of reputation infringement dispute case, Ma Rongfang submitted relevant direct evidence closely around Wang Baoqiang's announcement of sina Weibo personal behavior to constitute reputation infringement and the reputation damage caused to the appellant; Wang Baoqiang did not agree that the infringement of the appellant's right of reputation was damaged, but he did not return to court to submit direct evidence, indicating that it would be submitted within the period of proof, and the court gave each other a time limit to demand proof.
In addition, in the whole process of the trial of the pre court meeting of divorce cases, according to the defendant's proposal and the status of proof, the court stipulated that the joint trial should be conducted to provide further evidence for each other. Ma Rong also explicitly proposed to the court that the case should not be heard in public on the ground that the case involved private information of Chinese citizens. After verification, the people's Court of Chaoyang District in Beijing found that the application was in line with the relevant laws and regulations, and was granted approval in accordance with the regulations. However, Wang Baoqiang applied to the court to suspend the trial of the case of infringement of reputation right on the ground that there were two other cases of divorce and reputation infringement. The arbitration tribunal will decide whether to grant the application after assessment. That night, according to the pronunciation of sina Weibo, Wang Baoqiang indicated that the trial was very successful. He expressed his gratitude to the news media and his friends who paid close attention to himself, and said that "with everyone here, I have always been tenacious.".